Is it legal to record phone calls in Tennessee?
Yes, generally. Tennessee is a one-party consent state: you may record a phone call you take part in without telling the other person, because your own consent satisfies the rule. Recording calls you are not part of is illegal. When the other person may be in an all-party consent state like California or Florida, disclose the recording anyway.
What Tennessee law says
Tennessee follows one-party consent for phone calls, consistent with the federal Wiretap Act: as long as one participant — and you count — consents, the recording is lawful. The rule covers conversations you participate in; intercepting other people’s calls remains a crime. Bear in mind the rule protects you within Tennessee — interstate calls can implicate stricter states’ laws, which is why professionals default to disclosure.
Tennessee is a one-party consent state. Section 39-13-601 makes it a crime to intercept wire, oral, or electronic communications without the consent of at least one party, but expressly allows a participant — or anyone with one party's prior consent — to record unless the purpose is to commit a criminal or tortious act. Violations are a Class D felony under § 39-13-602, and § 39-13-603 adds civil damages of at least $10,000 per violation plus punitive damages and attorney fees.
"It is lawful under §§ 39-13-601 — 39-13-603 and title 40, chapter 6, part 3 for a person not acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication, where the person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception, unless the communication is intercepted for the purpose of committing any criminal or tortious act in violation of the constitution or laws of the state of Tennessee." — Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601(b)(5)
Federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d) mirrors Tennessee's one-party rule and does not preempt stricter state laws elsewhere. For purely intrastate Tennessee calls where you are a party, federal and state law align. Interstate calls to all-party states can still create liability under the destination state's statute even when Tennessee would permit the recording. Federal court orders for wiretaps are recognized in Tennessee criminal prosecutions when obtained without state-local collusion to circumvent Tennessee law.
If you are on the call, your own consent satisfies Tennessee law — no announcement, beep, or written permission from the other side is required. A third party may also record with one participant's prior consent. The critical caveat is purpose: the one-party shield disappears when the recording is made to commit a criminal or tortious act, so recordings gathered for blackmail, harassment, or fraud can still be illegal even when you are a party. Section 39-13-604 separately regulates recording cellular or cordless transmissions without one party's consent. Oral communications are protected only when a speaker has a reasonable expectation they are not being overheard, so loud public conversations generally fall outside the statute. Tennessee courts have recognized vicarious consent in narrow family contexts — a custodial parent may consent on behalf of a very young child — but that doctrine is fact-specific and does not give parents blanket authority to record older children's calls.
| Consent rule for phone calls | One-party consent |
| Recording calls you're part of | Allowed — your own consent is sufficient. |
| Calls with people in other states | The stricter state's rule may apply — when in doubt, disclose. |
What breaking the law costs in Tennessee
Illegal interception under § 39-13-601 is a Class D felony under § 39-13-602, punishable by 2 to 12 years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000. A separate violation of § 39-13-604 for recording certain cellular or cordless transmissions without one party's consent is a Class A misdemeanor (up to 11 months and 29 days). Disclosing or using illegally intercepted communications is also criminal under § 39-13-601.
Yes — § 39-13-603 gives any aggrieved person a private right of action for the greater of actual damages, $100 per day of violation, or $10,000, plus punitive damages, attorney fees, and litigation costs. Injunctive relief is available, and Robinson v. Fulliton held that when a violation is proven, courts must award at least the $10,000 statutory minimum — they cannot substitute nominal damages.
Exceptions worth knowing
- One-party consent: any participant may record, or any person may record with one party's prior consent, unless the purpose is criminal or tortious (§ 39-13-601(b)(5))
- Law enforcement interception under a court order issued under title 40, chapter 6, part 3
- Communications with no reasonable expectation of privacy are not protected oral communications
- Vicarious parental consent in limited circumstances for very young children (Lawrence v. Lawrence)
How Tennessee courts have ruled
Statutes set the rule; cases show how it plays out when a recording ends up in front of a judge. These are real, decided cases under Tennessee law.
What happened: During a pending divorce, Mother secretly recorded a phone call between Father and their 2½-year-old daughter without being on the line; the child was too young to consent. Father later sued for civil wiretap damages.
The ruling: The court adopted vicarious consent, holding that as a matter of law Mother could consent on the child's behalf to intercept and disclose the conversation, and that the legislature did not intend to impose criminal penalties for a parent's recording of a toddler's call during a custody dispute.
What happened: During marital difficulties, a husband planted a device to record his wife's phone calls and captured a conversation between the wife and her brother — neither of whom knew they were being recorded. The brother sued under § 39-13-603.
The ruling: The court held the interception violated the Act because neither party consented, affirmed liability, and reversed the trial court's $500 nominal award — ruling that proven violations require at least $10,000 in statutory damages under § 39-13-603.
What happened: A defendant challenged the State's use of recorded jail phone calls at trial, arguing the recordings were wire communications protected by the Wiretapping Act and were improperly admitted.
The ruling: The court analyzed § 39-13-601's scope and exceptions, explaining that the Act prohibits unauthorized interception and that lawful recording requires either court authorization or consent of at least one party under the statute's exceptions.
What happened: Defendants challenged the validity of a court-authorized wiretap order obtained under title 40, chapter 6, part 3, arguing the State failed to show probable cause that the targeted phones were used in connection with the charged offenses.
The ruling: The court reviewed the nexus requirements for electronic-surveillance orders under § 40-6-304, treating Tennessee's procedural wiretap scheme as parallel to federal law and emphasizing that non-consensual interception requires judicial authorization and probable cause.
What happened: A radio commentator broadcast an illegally intercepted cell-phone call about a teachers' union negotiation; the interceptors were unknown, and the station did not participate in the illegal recording.
The ruling: The Supreme Court held the First Amendment protected disclosure of lawfully obtained recordings on matters of public concern, even when the underlying interception violated wiretap statutes — though the decision does not legalize the initial secret recording.
Personal calls vs. business calls in Tennessee
Recording personal calls
You can record your own phone calls in Tennessee — with an ex-spouse, a harassing caller, a landlord — without telling the other person, because you are a party and your consent is enough. Those recordings are commonly used in divorce, custody, and protective-order cases. What you cannot do is tap calls between other people: Robinson v. Fulliton shows a brother-in-law winning $10,000 minimum damages when his sister's husband recorded their conversation without either party's consent. Lawrence v. Lawrence is the narrow exception for parents recording a very young child's call with the other parent when acting in the child's interest — not a license to surveil teenagers. If you call someone in California, Florida, or another all-party state, their stricter law can still reach you.
Recording business calls
Tennessee businesses may record customer and employee calls when a company representative is on the line or when policy obtains employee consent — no disclosure is legally required for purely intrastate calls. Most companies still announce recording because interstate calls and customer expectations make disclosure the safer default. Call centers, sales teams, and support lines operating from Tennessee should route interstate traffic through scripts that assume all-party consent. Employers who plant recorders to capture private employee conversations they are not party to — or who record for an independent tortious purpose — lose the § 39-13-601(b)(5) shield and face felony charges plus § 39-13-603 civil damages.
Calls that cross state lines
Tennessee courts have not issued a leading choice-of-law decision like California's Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney for cross-border calls. The practical rule: Tennessee's one-party standard protects recordings made entirely within the state, but if the other party is in an all-party-consent jurisdiction, that state's law may apply to your liability. Mobile numbers make location hard to verify, so businesses calling nationwide should announce recording on every outbound and inbound line.
The safe way to record in Tennessee
Whatever the local rule, one habit covers every situation: say the call is being recorded at the start. Consent is then on the recording itself, and cross-border calls stop being a legal puzzle. Callmark can play "This call may be recorded" automatically on your calls, so the disclosure never depends on your memory.
For the full national picture — every all-party state, cross-border rules, and consent mechanics — see our state-by-state consent guide.
Sources and further reading
Statutes, court opinions, and reference guides cited on this page. Laws change — verify current text before relying on it for anything consequential.
- Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601 — Prohibited acts and consent exceptions (Justia)
- Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-602 — Penalty for violations (Justia)
- Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-603 — Civil damages (Justia)
- Lawrence v. Lawrence, 360 S.W.3d 416 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010) — Tennessee Courts
- Robinson v. Fulliton (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) — Justia
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press — Tennessee recording guide
- Justia 50-State Survey — Recording Phone Calls and Conversations
Common questions
Yes. As a participant in the call, your consent satisfies Tennessee’s one-party rule. Disclosure is still wise whenever the other party might be in an all-party consent state.
Courts have applied different states' laws to interstate calls, and you often can't verify where a mobile number is. The practical rule: assume the strictest state applies and disclose the recording.
In most states, continuing a call after a clear "this call may be recorded" announcement is treated as implied consent — the same mechanism customer-service lines rely on.
Yes, if you are a party to the call. Tennessee Code § 39-13-601(b)(5) allows a participant to record without notifying anyone else. Recording a conversation you are not part of — without any party's consent — is a Class D felony under § 39-13-602 and triggers civil damages of at least $10,000 under § 39-13-603.
You can record calls you are on. Lawrence v. Lawrence allows a parent to vicariously consent to recording a very young child's call with the other parent in limited circumstances, but the court warned the doctrine does not extend to older children. Recording your ex's calls with third parties when you are not a participant is illegal wiretapping.
Criminal violations are a Class D felony (2–12 years, up to $5,000 fine). Civilly, § 39-13-603 awards the greater of actual damages, $100 per day, or $10,000, plus punitive damages and attorney fees. Robinson v. Fulliton held courts cannot award less than the $10,000 statutory floor once a violation is proven.
Generally yes if made lawfully under the one-party rule — authentication and hearsay rules still apply. Illegally intercepted communications are barred by the Act's purpose of keeping unlawfully obtained wire communications out of proceedings, and using them exposes the recorder to both criminal and civil liability.
Tennessee's one-party rule governs your conduct inside Tennessee, but the other person's state may impose stricter requirements. If they are in an all-party-consent state, recording without everyone's consent can violate that state's law regardless of where you dialed from. Announce recording on interstate business calls.
Yes, when the employer or a consenting employee is on the call, or when employees have consented through a monitoring policy. Secretly intercepting private employee calls that no consenting party joins remains a felony, and employees can sue for the § 39-13-603 statutory minimum.
Record responsibly in Tennessee, automatically.
Built-in disclosure · automatic transcripts and summaries · 200 minutes included
Get Callmark